
Last week, Shanna Groves posed a question in the Say What Club Blog. Is there a Hard-of-Hearing Culture? My gut response was NO. There’s a Deaf culture, but HH/deaf culture?? Nah. I can’t stop thinking about it. The more I learn about Deaf culture, the more I feel set apart. The main difference between Deaf and deaf is language, and it’s a huge difference.
Is there a Hearing culture? The Deaf might say so. But if someone ever asked my culture I would answer that I’m American. I’m also hard-of-hearing, raised-protestant-now-religion-undefined, and vegetarian. Maybe I behave differently from some Americans, but all of my behaviors fall within American norms more or less. I’d call religion and vegetarianism interest groups. Is being hard-of-hearing the same?
I googled the definition of culture and found an anthropology website that named a combined set of properties cultures share. They are: shared, learned, symbolic, transmitted cross-generationally, adaptive and integrated.
Wikipedia defined culture similarly –
• an integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon the capacity for symbolic thought and social learning
In other words, you can’t be born with a culture. Cultural patterns, beliefs and behaviors are learned. Wikipedia’s second definition was –
• a set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes an institution, organization or group.
It’s interesting. Do HH/deaf people share certain behaviors? I can think of many ways they do. For one thing, like the Deaf most hh/deaf rely heavily on their vision for communication, but oral language and lip reading seems to be the most widely used way to communicate, not ASL. Maybe it’s because most of us (not all) are late-deafened and we learned English as children. It’s certainly NOT because lip reading is the most effective way communicate. Shanna mentioned attending HLAA and ALDA meetings where hh/deaf people used both verbal language and signing– sim-com and pidgin sign. Few use ASL exclusively. I see the same thing, everywhere– HLAA, ALDA, IFHOH, SWC.
There is some symbolism associated with hearing loss. I would say lips are our symbol, comparable to the Deaf’s ILY sign. Most of us have been handed a ‘Face me, I read lips’ pin at hearing loss meetings and conventions. They seem to be everywhere at our functions.
Our poems, our words, our art is different from Deaf art in some ways too. Like Deaf we feel a disconnect with the majority of hearing people we associate, but unlike Deaf we don’t have a separate language to fill the gap. Our art is filled with allusions to broken dreams, loneliness, communication barriers, and misunderstanding. I see it as a kind of painful beauty like the metamorphosis of a butterfly. The butterfly is another symbol many of us identify with. While Deaf art glorifies hands, HH/deaf art exaggerates lips, mouths and ears, sometimes mutilated ears. (Informal study on my part.)
There’s a learning curve to navigating hearing loss. We’re not born lip readers. The way we behave in restaurants, our pickiness about seating arrangements, sitting in corners at parties with our backs to the wall, searching out spots with good lighting, our preferences for carpeted rooms, the routine care of our hearing gadgetry- these are all learned behaviors. We teach these ‘tricks of the trade’ to the newly deafened. It’s what we all do. Signing is encouraged to a certain extent, but not emphasized. If you hang out with these groups long enough, you WILL pick up some sign. We also have bad habits as a group. Bluffing is a biggie. Accidental interrupting is another. We’re aware of it and call each other on it.
Is our culture passed across generations? Like the Deaf, many HH/deaf parents have hearing children. Though our children don’t learn a different language, they do learn different communication behaviors—waving at and tapping a parent to get attention, and making sure to look people in the eyes when talking. Our children learn at a young age they can sass us when our backs are turned, but our noses can smell trouble a mile away. Repeating and rephrasing becomes a way of life. Additionally, just as Deafness runs in some families, mild to severe hearing loss runs in some families. So–there is a cross-generational aspect to the deaf/hh group, but not as strong as Deaf culture.
The HH/deaf have similar values and goals to the Deaf regarding access, but we differ a little bit on the ASL issue. We’re more accepting of hearing aids, cochlear implants and any technology that enhances English understanding. Technology offers the ability to communicate with our hearing families and friends, not ASL. Still many of us do appreciate visual languages, though we’re generally more open-minded about those—simcom, pidgin sign, signed English, cueing. . .anything goes.
Like the Deaf, the hh/deaf have their own separate clubs where they socialize and discuss hh/deaf concerns. We share inside jokes about hearing aid and implant mishaps, and funny hearing bloopers. We’re big on trying each other’s gadgets. Pencils and paper are almost always available for those who need them and we’re patient about writing stuff down. Expectations for hearing and signing abilities are pretty low, but most of us speak. Our organizations are growing and becoming very strong politically.
Like the Deaf we are proud of our hh/deaf heroes– Juliette Low, Thomas Edison, Beethoven, Deaf (Erastus) Smith, Robert Weitbrecht, Cal Rogers are only a few. We have our own history. Our heroes read lips, spoke, and some could also sign. We look up to people who have moved beyond deafness, unlike the Deaf who sometimes revere their Deafhood. We are people who happen to be deaf. They are Deaf people. The difference is subtle, but important to both groups, I think.
The evolution of hearing equipment and teaching techniques enabling oral communication is part of our shared history with the Deaf. The hh/deaf tend to bestow gratitude on organizations like AGBell and cochlear implant companies. I’ve spoken with many oral deaf who endured the rigors of speech therapy as children and are glad they can communicate orally today. Many Deaf who can speak take a dim view of forcing oral language on Deaf children. Some even consider it child abuse.
The hh/deaf are distinct from the Deaf and hearing people in many ways. We value oral languages and visual languages. We feel kinship with hearing people and Deaf people. We have been hearing. We are now deaf.
What do you think? Do the hh/deaf have their own culture? Or are we merely an interest group?





